Where Does India’s Economic Recovery Stand In Comparison To Other Emerging Markets?

One of the key things that has kept many of us preoccupied is undertaking cross-country comparisons, whether in the form of the extent of impact of the pandemic, its economic implications, the appropriate policy response or the economic recovery process.

The question that thus emerges is where does India rank in comparison with its peers.

Such a discussion has been of particular interest ever since India recorded one of the sharpest contractions in the first fiscal quarter. Since then, many have been wondering whether India’s economic recovery would lag behind its peers.

As stated earlier in several articles, we must recognise that lockdown means a reduction in the level of economic output due to restrictions imposed by the government.

Several such requirements have been removed since then, but the evaluation of the recovery process must consider two things. First, is the extent of stringency of a lockdown along with its duration. This is important as it provides a crude idea of the extent of impact that a lockdown would have on the economy.

The second issue pertains to the pace of relaxation of the lockdown restrictions — or the gradual opening up of the economy. The economic recovery process thus must be viewed with this backdrop in mind.

Figures 1 and 2 provide a comparison of India with several other emerging market economies with regards to the stringency of the lockdowns and other restrictions that have been enforced.

It shows several things — first, that the lockdown in India was by far the most stringent and this has been repeated several times since then. The second point is that the relaxation process has been fairly gradual, which is illustrated in a modest dip after the relaxation of the restrictions.

It is further interesting to note that India never really had a stringency score lower than 65 since the imposition of lockdown. The other point is with regards to the present situation, whereby India scores third in terms of the stringency of its restrictions. China tops the list followed by Mexico and then India.

This information is important when we look at the growth recovery process that is underway in these countries, as we must put in context the local restrictions in each of these countries before we do any such comparisons.

The two figures below track the quarterly real GDP growth rates for the same group of countries. Seven of these countries have GDP figures for the second quarter of the current fiscal year.

Given the stringency of India’s lockdown, no surprises that India did not do well with regards to the first quarter. However, what we find is that India has done better than three countries, namely Mexico and Philippines in the second quarter period. This is the phase when India had a much more stringent lockdown than compared to all the other countries.

We must recognise that each country is at a different stage on both the public health emergency front and on the economic recovery front as several countries in Europe reintroduce fresh round of such restrictions.

This means that recovery assisted by exports is bound to be hit due to these restrictions. What this means is that containing the spread of the disease followed by vaccination drives becomes a top priority for countries in order to ensure an unhindered growth recovery process.

This implies that the growth recovery process in India may very well be stronger. As is the case, many have been positively surprised by the extent of the pace of normalisation of economic activity, so who knows, India just might surprise everyone over the coming few quarters.