A Tale Of Two Hacks: Pegasus And China’s Microsoft Exchange Penetration

In the recent past, we have seen a lot of news stories. Massive riots in South Africa and Cuba. The uncertainty in Afghanistan. Floods in Germany and China. Surging Wuhan virus cases in hitherto relatively unscathed Southeast Asia. A ‘border clash’ between Assam and Mizoram. Bezos going one-up over Branson in the space race. China being accused of large-scale hacking of Microsoft Exchange a few months ago.

So there are plenty of real, meaty stories to report on.

Yet, the Indian media was full of stories about something dubious: the alleged Pegasus hacking expose. There are two problems with it. One is that, as a narrative, it makes no sense; in fact, the meta-narrative is far more interesting. Two: It is an outstanding example of how gaslighting works on Indians (but not on Chinese).

The Meta-Narrative About Pegasus

The most obvious conclusion is that a time-honoured tactic is in play: throw a whole lot of dirt, and hope some of it sticks. So far, almost nothing they have tried has worked, but that is not going to stop them. They will keep coming.

The recent Rafale allegations were warmed-over allegations that an NGO named Sherpa and some website had already made. The money trail as to who funds Sherpa and friends is quite instructive. (Hint: some white billionaires).

The Pegasus allegation is also not new: it is recycled from before, as seen in these screenshots from 2019 and 2020.

If you follow the trail on the ‘AdivasiLivesMatters’ post, you end up with one of their prime motivations: the whitewashing of the 'urban naxals' who have been hauled up for mostly sedition and fomenting separatism. The breast-beating over one of them, Stanslaus Lourdusamy, Society of Jesus, is of recent memory.

In the US, there is widespread surveillance by the government. Under the sainted Obama in 2010, they even tapped the phone of their most important ally, Germany’s Angela Merkel.

The US left are good at narratives. There is the salutary example of what happened to the Trump administration in 2020. It appears there was a concerted effort by various vested interests to gaslight the US electorate, leading to the (somewhat violent) overthrow of the incumbent. I am not making this up: TIME magazine outlined it as the “inside story of the conspiracy to save democracy”.

For a dissenting opinion, please read the startling substack below that tells the story that has been suppressed.

Much has been written about it, so I shall not belabour the point. But the fact is that the narrative has changed from “50,000 phones hacked” to “50,000 phones may have been hacked” to “the 50,000 phone list is an indicative list of phones that someone could potentially want to hack” suggests that this is like “Aryan Invasion” becoming “Aryan Migration” and then “Aryan Tourist(™)” Theory.

Or how “Kerala has slayed Corona” became “Kerala has 50 per cent of Corona cases in India”. In Trump’s case it was “The Steele Dossier documents how Russian prostitutes peed on Trump” to “There is no evidence that the Russia narrative has any basis according to the special prosecutor”. But the narratives succeeded in gaslighting mostly everybody for a while.

And who are the alleged hack-ees in India? To be honest, hardly any of them is particularly interesting, nor likely to be the bearer of state secrets. It’s quite a weak list. On average, these are not people any self-respecting government would want to snoop on. There are many other 'people of interest' in the country that a spy agency would want to phone-tap.

Clearly, there was a toolkit, and the memos had gone out to rally the troops to all sing from the same hymn-book.

The sum and substance of all this is that there was a concerted effort to paint India as a violator of freedom of speech. All the usual suspects were involved. Diligent people who dug into the antecedents of various groups involved and followed the money trail arrived at the conclusion that there are a few sinister individuals and organisations behind this. The presumed goal: regime-change and preferably balkanisation of India. No surprise, this.

Even though this particular effort was an abject failure — nobody in India gave a damn, and within a day it had disappeared even from the NYTimes (so it is possible to embarrass Deep State bastions) — this is not the end of it. The ecosystem will, like Robert Bruce, try, try and try again.

The Reaction To Chinese Hacking: Softly, Softly

Simultaneously, there was the case of the Microsoft Exchange hack from earlier in the year, which affected some 30,000 businesses.

As this magazine, a known cheerleader for the Deep State, points out, the US, its Five Eyes Anglo allies (the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), Japan, and the EU got together, and gave China a delicate slap on the wrist. The fact that all of them “admonished” China together means that they would not be able to agree on anything to “punish” China other than the most anodyne and soothing actions.

Why?, one might ask. Why is the all-powerful West unwilling or unable to tackle cyber-mischief from China, when the evidence is all over the place? And why are they so quick to pounce on India when there is vanishingly small evidence of wrong-doing here?

There are several answers, and none of them are particularly appealing.

The first is that the West, and especially the US, is so enmeshed with China that despite all the huffing and puffing by President Joe Biden, no decoupling is going to happen.

The third is that India is far easier to bully because we are easily gaslighted and shamed by Anglosphere narratives, do not retaliate, and are infiltrated by fifth columnists. India could have sent a message by putting the screws on Amazon, as Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, which was active in the Pegasus fairy tale.

It could also have, as I have been saying ad nauseam, sued or defenestrated the pompous white migrant workers from The Economist, FT, BBC, WaPo, NPR and all the other hostile media, as Lee Kwan Yew used to do with such salutary effect.

Until India applies some pain to the perpetrators of fraud and their paymasters, this sort of thing will continue.