A Gesture For Peace: Why Muslim Leadership Should Hand Over 'Kashi' And 'Mathura'

On 21 January, 1986, a petition (no. 422/C) was moved before Munsiff Sadar Faizabad for opening the locks of Sri Rama Janmabhoomi. In his order dated 1 February 1986, District Judge K.M.Pandey gave a judgement for opening the locks of the Sri Ram Janmabhoomi temple, under the mosque-like-domes.

On 12 November 1990, the Rath Yatra of Lal Krishna Advani began from Somnath in Gujarat. On 23 October, he was arrested as he entered Bihar, by the administration of Lalu Prasad Yadav, then the state Chief Minister.

The whole series of events changed the history of India and catapulted the BJP to power. But even when the demolition was almost 18 months in the future, an interesting alternate-scenario was discussed and it was presented by two Muslim thinkers and both were not thinkers sympathetic to the BJP.

One was Yasin Dalal. A renowned researcher, writer and a social reformist he wrote:

As stated earlier both the articles were written by Muslim thinkers and activists who were highly critical of the BJP world-view. They wrote them almost a year and a half before demolition of the domes over the Sri Ram Lalla temple at Ayodhya on December 6, 1992. But both were voices of reason and peace. Had the Muslim leadership heeded to such voices a lot of human suffering and misery could have been avoided. We also know now from the testimony of K. K. Muhammad, the renowned archeologist, that had there been no foul-play by Marxist historians, the Muslim community would have gladly handed over the land at the Sri Rama Janmabhoomi.

Now with the Kashi Vishwanath temple-Gyanvapi issue flaring up, we need to ask certain questions.

-The current demand for the return of Kashi Gyanvapi temple complex has presented the present Muslim leadership with a wonderful opportunity that can make Islam truly a religion of peace. Will they stand and grasp that opportunity?

-Second is that the Gyanvapi issue has made a lot of similar demands arise in various parts of the country. Where do we draw the line and how?

The answers to both the questions are inter-related.

The destruction of the temples of non-Islamic faith and constructing Islamic places of worship is an act of aggression and enslavement imposed on people of other faiths. The basic premise driving this is that Islam replaces the previous 'erroneous faiths of the age of ignorance'.

A powerful section of Islamist politics is still predicated upon this premise.

The politics based on this premise is intolerant of theo-diversity. It wants to destroy theo-diversity and democracy. But at the same time it wants to use the space that theo-diversity and democracy give to this Islamist politics.

This hurts them and humiliates them. They carry this hurt and humiliation back home. They may not express it but it creates a deep wound. Such unhealed wounds of the hearts are ticking time-bombs against harmony and well being of the nation.

The solution that Nehruvian establishment came up with was simple. Do not bother. Those temples are not worth bothering about. Visiting the sacred places are just a dying tradition. Within a few generations Hindus would immerse themselves in secular development and stop bothering about these temples altogether.

But the wounds are alive. After a heavy battle and loss of lives on both sides, Ayodhya has been healed. What about Kashi and Mathura?

Whatever the course of action, it is only a matter of time before the waiting Nandi is going to get his Master back and Krishna is going to get His sacred mansion back.

If Hindus are forced to fight legal and political battles to win them both then it shows that the mindset of humiliating Hindus is very well alive. It is not medieval past but a living component of Islamist core. If this happens then the Hindus will be justified in reclaiming each and every temple that has been destroyed and forcefully occupied by Islamist invasions.

As against that if the Muslim leadership and community willingly and in a grand gesture of good will, repentance and healing, return Kashi and Mathura, then the Hindus should accept that act of good will and repentance. That act should be considered as repentance for all vandalism of Hindu temples. It also means that Islam is ready to accept theo-diversity. That means a giant civilisational and spiritual leap for Islam as a whole. Then Hindus should show magnanimity and a confederation of Hindu Dharmacharyas and Hindu organisations should assure Muslims that there would be no more claims on religious places.

Now it is in the hands of Indian Muslims to show that they have the spiritual strength to rise up to this occasion and make a grand gesture of peace for India and Islam.