Politics

Chronology Of Conspiracy: How They Orchestrated Anti-CAA Protests And Violence In Delhi, Riots Chargesheet Explains

  • In a chargesheet filed recently, Special Crime Branch of Delhi Police dedicates over 700 pages in detailing the ‘chronology of conspiracy’ behind anti-CAA protests, violence and rioting that was unleashed from December 2019 to February 2020 in the national capital.
  • Below is a brief summary of the same.

Arihant PawariyaSep 30, 2020, 10:01 PM | Updated 10:01 PM IST
Yogendra Yadav, Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid were key people behind organising the anti-CAA protests in New Delhi.

Yogendra Yadav, Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid were key people behind organising the anti-CAA protests in New Delhi.


When Parliament passed the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in December last year, many areas in New Delhi and other parts of the country erupted in protests which soon led to violent clashes and ultimately culminated in widespread riots in the North-East district of the national capital.

Many believed that the anger of the protesters was spontaneous and the events precipitated by passing of the CAA were a result of genuine outpouring of resentment against the government.

But investigation by Delhi Police criminal branch has now revealed that there was nothing natural about the anti-CAA movement and the whole campaign was orchestrated by a few actors who worked impressively in tandem to manufacture the environment of anger by whipping communal sentiments of Muslim community with lies and disinformation.


It all started with Sharjeel Imam who has been established as the chief mastermind by the police in its 15,000 pages long chargesheet filed recently. The Citizenship Amendment Bill was cleared for introduction in Parliament by the Union Cabinet on 4 December 2019. Next day, Imam and others created a WhatsApp group ‘Muslim Students of JNU’.

Below is a snippet of a chat between Imam and Arshad Warsi, who was part of radical communal group, Students of Jamia (SOJ).


The pamphlet being discussed in the chat was against the Supreme Court’s verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi land dispute case delivered in November. “Law of Allah above all else. Babri Masjid will remain a masjid,” the pamphlet read.



On 7 December, Imam joined the anti-CAA protest at Jantar Mantar which was called by the ‘United Against Hate’ group run by former JNU student Umar Khalid and a local Muslim leader Abdul Khalid, both of whom are currently accused and in jail for the conspiracy.

Sharjeel Imam mobilised Muslim students of JNU to take them to Jantar Mantar. In his chats with Warsi on the same day, he revealed his strategy of mobilising students of JNU, Jamia, AMU and DU.


On 8 December, the meeting took place.

“It was decided in the meeting to execute the earlier agreed conspiracy of Chakka Jaam. It was decided that Sharjeel Imam will mobilise and lead the students of various Universities and colleges in and around Delhi. It was agreed by all in the meeting that teams of United Against Hate, Swaraj Abhiyan, like minded left parties and members of civil society will support him and each other by every means,” the chargesheet says.


On 10 December, a protest was organised and a core members’ meeting of MSJ was held at a dhaba in JNU and attended by members of JNU Muslim group, Jamia students group, Popular Front of India, Pinjra Tod, SDPI and Swaraj Abhiyan.

In the meeting, it was decided that meetings will be held with AIMMA of different mosques through local leaders, Jamia alumni will be contacted to extend support, list of head of maslaks will be created and they will be asked to join the movement, over-secularisation of movement should be avoided because CAA is against Muslims and “we should stick to our own identity”.

Imam visited Aligarh Muslim University the next day to mobilise students there.


Imam arranged a bus and mobilised Muslims students in JNU to take them to Jamia from where the protest march was going to start.

In one of the chats, the accused are admitting that they know they won’t be allowed to reach Parliament and that whenever they are stopped by the police, they should move to any highway and block it.

Below is the pamphlet that was distributed by the accused for the protest march.


The pamphlet reads, “thousands of Muslim youth are ready to disrupt Delhi which will give international media attention to our issue.” It’s clear from this that the ultimate goal of initial masterminds was always to create chaos and anarchy in the national capital by blocking roads.

The protest march called by Sharjeel Imam and company turned violent on 13 March and 20 police personnel sustained injuries.


A plan to organise a chakka jaam was hatched.

“This is important as there was consensus that a big reaction is possible from Okhla and Jamia but the disorganised protest has made it difficult. Some important road like Mathura road needs to be blocked. The zuhar namaaz will be offered in jamaat ki markaz masjid, and there we will talk to Jamaat senions about our plan (sic),” reads the minutes of the meeting posted on the MSJ WhatsApp group.


It is pertinent to note that, on the same day, two violent incidents of rioting flared up near Jamia. In the ensuing violence in which protesters used petrol bombs, rods and sticks to attack police, three DTC busses were burnt, eight more were damaged apart from three motorcycles, a police vehicle and other public property. In total, 45 cops were injured.


Below is a conversation of Imam with his brother where the former admits being a mastermind of the Shaheen Bagh highway blockade after Reuters covered the protest.


On 17 December, Jamia Coordination Committee (JCC) was constituted (which police has called as the brainchild of Umar Khalid). This was done to rope in different organisations like Student Islamic Organisation, Pinjra Tod, AAJMI, SFI, etc, so that protests can be organised in a coordinated manner.





By mid-January, Sharjeel Imam had become the face of anti-CAA protests in Delhi. As established by police, he was the chief architect of illegal takeover of the highway in Shaheen Bagh and by 15 January, he also managed to create permanent sit-in protest sites at Khureji with the help of Khalid Saifi.

In all the activities, Imam was deeply involved whether it is preparing the propaganda material, organising marches, inciting students and local Muslims with his speeches, enrolling radical Islamist organisations or inciting violence and riots in December in which as many as 10 FIRs have been registered.

His main contributions, so far, were:

a) manufacturing the whole anti-CAA movement out of nothing — by roping in Muslim students of JNU, Jamia, AMU and DU. He did this with the help of Umar Khalid and other local Muslim leaders;


c) Roping in imams of local mosques and supplying them with propaganda material which he convinced them to use in their daily sermons;

d) Deploying the strategy of permanent sit-in protest sites near mosques in Muslim majority localities;

e) Blocking major highways or important roads in the national capital by making anti-CAA protesters illegally take over those public properties.

But he was soon sidelined. On 16 January, he delivered a communal speech in Aligarh Muslim University, where he gave an open threat to mobilise enough Muslims so as to permanently cut off Assam and the North-East from India by taking over the so-called chicken-neck, a narrow area which links West Bengal to Assam.

Portion of Sharjeel Imam’s speech where he talked about permanently cutting off Assam from India.

On 25 January, Imam was booked by Uttar Pradesh Police for sedition, for this speech. He was then conveniently sidelined.

Secularisation Of The Movement


So, on 24 December, after a protest at Jantar Mantar, Yogendra Yadav, Umar Khalid, Rahul Roy and others decided to change strategy and call a meeting of all prominent anti-CAA organisations and individuals to form a group for creating of protest sites in Delhi and sustaining them for a long period of time.

Below is a portion from the chargesheet which explains why the need to change the strategy was felt by these people.


Consequently, they formed Delhi Protests Support Group (DPSG) after a meeting on 26 December in Indian Social Institute (ISI) which was attended by Yogendra Yadav, Harsh Mander, Umar Khalid, Khalid Saifi, Rahul Roy and his wife Saba Dewan among others.

In the meeting, record of which was posted in the DPSG WhatsApp group (accessed fully by the Delhi Police), following points were decided (I am listing the chief points verbatim)


Subsequently, the group played a key role in not only setting up new sites in Muslim dominated areas (Khureji, Seelampur, Inderlok, Nizamuddin, Dariyaganj, Chand Bagh, Brijipur Pulia to name a few) but also providing funds for sustaining them in addition to planning public protests in various parts of Delhi, and supplying the protesters with a team of lawyers in case they are detained by the police.

Below is a snippet from the DPSG WhatsApp group which shows how a dedicated team of lawyers was always on standby to come to the rescue of protesters. (This is just one page. Police has detailed such chats running over many pages)


Towards Violence



When the schedule of US President Donald Trump’s visit to India was announced on 12 February, the organisers decided to change their strategy.

“A meeting of protest site leaders of Chand Bagh, Mustafabad, Kardumpuri and Jafrabad was held in the night intervening of 16/17 Feb’20 at 2:00 AM. In the morning it was decided and agreed that a coordinated blockade of traffic on roads i.e. Chakka Jam will be executed during the visit of USA President Donald Trump by the members of all the protest sites of the North-East Delhi. After Chakka-Jam, all protest site members will instigate and resort to violence and riots (sic),” the chargehsheet says.


Below is his conversation in the DPSG group where he vowed that he will not let violence happen.







Ovais also highlights the role of Pinjra Tod in instigating the violence in North-East Delhi just before Trump was to land in India.





On 24 February, when riots had broken out in full force, lawyer Anas Tanvir also says that this seems like a concerted plan by members of their own side.



In the chargesheet, police says that after these message of some members threatening to expose the role played by others in inciting violence were posted, a flurry of calls (17 to be precise) were made between top people of the DPSG group.


Additionally, police notes that on 25 February, many more members were added to the DPSG group who were not related to the conspiracy. This was done in order to change “their stripes to show themselves as peace lovers by organising rescue and relief work for riot victims”, the chargesheet notes.

Join our WhatsApp channel - no spam, only sharp analysis