Twitter 'Deliberately' Defiant To Laws Of The Land: Centre Tells Karnataka High Court

Bengaluru, Sep 2 (PTI) The Centre has told the Karnataka High Court that Twitter 'deliberately' remained non-compliant and defiant to the laws of the land and that the social media giant has no role to play in the security of the country.

The submission was made by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) in its 101-page statement of objections on Thursday while opposing the micro-blogging platform's petition before the high court against the government's takedown and blocking orders.

On the claims by Twitter that political tweets were asked to be taken down, the Centre stated that it had only asked for unverified accounts to be blocked.

'The petitioner deliberately remained non-compliant and defiant to the laws of the land. Only on the diligent follow up of the respondent No.2(Centre) and upon the issuance of show cause notice dated 27.06.2022 the petitioner for reasons best known to it suddenly complied with all the blocking directions,' the Centre said while seeking dismissal of the petition.

Twitter has challenged blocking orders for 39 URLs. The hearing in the case is slated to be held on September 8.

In its petition, Twitter had claimed that freedom of speech is affected by the takedown notices of the government. The originators of the content on its platform were not issued notices before their content was asked to be taken down, it said.

However, the government in its objections said that since Twitter was the intermediary, it was the micro-blogging site's responsibility to inform the users.

'When a public order issue arises, it is the government that is responsible to take action and not the platform. Hence, whether content will cause national security or public order issues or not should not be allowed to be determined by the platforms.' The Centre submitted that any private policy or rules made by online platforms are subject to the Information Technology Act 2000. 'Foreign platforms providing services in the country shall not be entitled to claim that the Indian laws and rules are not applicable upon them. Any such claim is legally untenable,' it said.

The objections also called for dismissal of the petition on the ground that Twitter is not entitled to seek relief as it is not a citizen of India.

'Article 21 rights are not available to artificial juristic entities, much less, to any foreign commercial entity. The present petition even if it attempts to allege breach of Article 21 rights, is therefore, not maintainable at the instance of the petitioner foreign company.' The government said it is its responsibility to protect over 84 crore Indians using Internet from anti-India propaganda, fake news and hate speech content.

'These contents have the potential to jeopardize the peace in the country. Thus, it becomes essential to detect and block such misinformation content and fake news at the initial stage itself to prevent a public order catastrophe like situation in the country.'

(This story has been published from a wire agency feed without any modifications to the text. Only the headline has been changed.)