Insta
Swarajya Staff
Sep 28, 2020, 12:21 PM | Updated 12:21 PM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
A civil suit has been filed in a Mathura court, to reclaim the Krishna Janmabhoomi land in the city, reports Hindustan Times.
The petition seeking ownership of the entire 13.37 acres of Krishna Janambhoomi land in the temple town and removal of the Shahi Idgah Masjid.
The suit was filed on the behalf of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman at Katra Keshav Dev Khewat, Mauja Mathura Bazaar City through petitioner Ranjana Agnihotri and six other devotees.
Agnihotri, a Lucknow-based lawyer, had represented the Hindu Mahasabha in the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit in various courts, including the Supreme Court.
The fresh suit filed by Sri Krishna Virajman through Agnihotri said, "UP Sunni Waqf Board, Trust Masjid Idgah or any member of Muslim community have no interest or right in the property of Katra Keshav Dev over an area measuring 13.37 acres and entire land vests in the deity Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman."
"This suit is being filed for removal of encroachment and superstructure illegally raised by committee of management of alleged Trust Masjid Idgah with the consent of Sunni Central Board of Waqf on land Khewat No 255 at Katra Keshav Dev, city Mathura belonging to deity Srikrishna Virajman," said Agnihotri.
The site in Mathura is believed to be the birthplace of Lord Krishna. Along with Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya and Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, it's one of the three sites which Hindu outfits want to be restored to Hindus.
The main litigant, advocate Ranjana Agnihotri, told reporters that her petition had already been admitted by the Mathura court.
Over the provisions of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which may be a stumbling block in the adjudication of the suit, Agnihotri said she was confident that the said Act would not be a problem in the adjudication of the suit filed by her.
"I have drafted the suit after studying the provisions of the 1991 Act and it will not hamper my case. As it is, my petition has already been admitted by the court," she added.
With Inputs From IANS