Insta
Swarajya Staff
Jul 15, 2019, 11:18 AM | Updated 11:18 AM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Chapter 4 of the Economic Survey 2019 talks about using data by the government in social sector, where private investment remains low. The survey points out that while the marginal cost of data has gone down in recent years, thanks to tech advancements, the marginal benefits to society have risen multifold.
Benefits:
Costs:
Knowledge and consent of the data principal, compliance with privacy laws is important at all the above stages.
The Survey envisions data as a “public good”. In line of the spirit of the Constitution of India, data should be “of the people, for the people, by the people.”
As people shift their day to day activities online, from tax-filing to groceries shopping, huge amount of data that would have otherwise taken laborious surveys to be gathered, is being saved on public and private servers at near-zero costs.
The government can ensure better service delivery by bringing discrete data-sets scattered across various ministries together. It will also reduce inclusion and exclusion errors.
Economic Survey talks about Intimate data, Anonymised data and Public data.
The survey talks about three key characteristics of a government-driven data revolution:
Why data should be a public good?
While more and more private sector companies are harnessing data, some fields where data is not as ubiquitously harnessed and used. For example, agriculture market. The social sectors of the economy, such as education and healthcare, have lagged the commercial sectors in exploiting data, because the private sector cannot internalise the social benefits of data in these sectors.
Private sector may not have the risk-appetite or capital that is required to generate data with the three characters mentioned above. Since upfront costs of generating data may be high, government needs to step in.
If private sector indeed generates the data with three characteristics, it may give rise to a monopoly that would reduce citizen welfare, and also violate the principle of data by citizens, and, therefore, for citizens.
Private sector would fail to provide an optimal amount of any non-rivalrous, non-excludable good, where as data possesses these qualities of being a public good- non-rivalrous and excludable. Therefore, government intervention is required.
Data are generated by the people, of the people and should be used for the people. As a public good, data can be democratised and put to the best possible use.
To ensure that the socially optimum amount of data is harvested and used for social welfare, keeping in mind the safety and privacy concerns, the government needs to step in. It can do so by directly providing data, or by creating an incentive structure for the private players.
The survey hails the following.
We shall continue with this chapter and more in the next part. You can read previous parts of these series here.